You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 1, January 6, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Patient Mix and Utilization of Resources

Daniel Z. Louis; Joseph S. Gonnella, MD
Jefferson Medical College Philadelphia, Pa

JAMA. 1993;269(1):43-44.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Two recent articles described results from the Medical Outcomes Study.1,2 Significant differences were reported in the mix of patients among medical specialties and in resource utilization among specialties controlling for patient mix. We are troubled by problems in the diagnostic accuracy, lack of specificity, and the authors' use of the measures of clinical severity for patients with hypertension, diabetes mellitus, recent myocardial infarction, and congestive heart failure.

It appears that patients were assigned diagnostic labels based on physician reports. Was any attempt made to validate the accuracy of the diagnosis? Were any laboratory data collected that document that the patient had the diagnosis assigned by the physician? Is it possible that some physicians were more accurate in their diagnoses than others?

The instruments used to measure disease severity lack specificity. The cause is not stated for either congestive heart failure or hypertension although cause is important . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.