You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 12, March 24, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Second-Opinion Trial in Patients Recommended for Coronary Angiography

Mark A. Milchak, MD
Sewickley (Pa) Valley Hospital

JAMA. 1993;269(12):1504.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—I read with interest the article by Graboys et al.1I find their data interesting; however, their conclusions are quite bothersome. The suggestion that 50% of the catheterizations performed in the United States are unjustified is simply not supported by the data.

Several points should be emphasized. The study involved only 171 patients at an institution that must certainly have performed several thousand catheterizations over the 7 years included in the study. The fact that the initial recommendation for the procedure generated enough patient anxiety that a second opinion was sought leads me to believe that there was a high degree of inappropriate test ordering in the sample group. The study patients therefore do not constitute an adequate sampling of patients undergoing cardiac catheterization.

The clinical course of the patients studied was not completely benign since it included 11 deaths and 19 new infarctions. In the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.