This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

David A. Cooley, MD
Shawnee Mission, Kan

JAMA. 1993;269(13):1633.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The recent article by Hillman et al¹ fails to address quality of care or outcome following treatment of any condition studied. Only the imaging cost was addressed. Rheumatologists in private practice regularly correct nonmusculoskeletal radiologists in their misinterpretation of bone and joint roentgenograms. Patients' roentgenograms with clearly abnormal sacroiliac joints are frequently misread, leading to unnecessary surgery, delay in diagnosis, and further inappropriate and costly care. Sequential follow-up comparisons of joint damage are rarely noted as a portion of radiologists' interpretations. Last, charges for roentgenograms become moot as Medicare, preferred provider organizations, and health maintenance organizations limit reimbursement, regardless of charge.

If we are to limit the nonradiologist physician from performing roentgenograms in his or her own office, should we also limit radiologists from performing follow-up computed tomographic scans or magnetic resonance imaging (MR I) when an abnormality is found in a routine roentgenogram and force . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?