You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 13, April 7, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Physicians and Outpatient Diagnostic Imaging: Overexposed?

Robert J. Varipapa, MD
Dover, Del

JAMA. 1993;269(13):1633-1634.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Hillman et al1 should be congratulated in their zeal to rid medicine of self-referral practices. However, they should look into the practices of their own specialty, where self-referral is rampant. Every practicing physician knows that radiologists frequently recommend additional studies to be sure some elusive pathologic process is ruled out. The clinician commonly will agree, if for no other reason than to avoid fear of a malpractice suit. Perhaps this isn't really a self-referral, but rather an "auto-referral."

Not only do radiologists "auto-refer," but in my experience they only recommend procedures that they perform. For example, radiologists at our local hospital started recommending MRI studies only after their scanner was placed in operation. Beforehand, they conveniently suggested computed tomographic scans. On the other hand, radiologists at a freestanding imaging center (solely owned by radiologists, I might add) rarely if ever recommend MRI studies, a procedure not . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.