This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (24)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Harold C. Sox, Jr, MD; Steven H. Woolf, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1993;269(20):2678.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Clinical practice guidelines are an important innovation to improve the quality of care by defining appropriate clinical practice.¹ A growing number of organizations are using evidence-based methods to develop practice guidelines.² This approach emphasizes the critical evaluation of evidence, rather than expert opinion, to define proper care. Evidence-based methods have been used for over a decade to develop guidelines on clinical preventive services, beginning with the work of the Canadian Task Force on the Periodic Health Examination in the late 1970s.³Clinical preventive services include screening tests (eg, mammography), counseling interventions (eg, smoking cessation), and immunizations.

See also p 2664.

The need for evidence of effectiveness is never higher than when clinicians advise healthy people about preventive services rather than treating existing disease. Therefore, it is important to ensure that the benefits of preventive services (eg, a longer, healthier life) exceed their potential harms (eg, mislabeling, complications . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the US Preventive Services Task Force, Washington, DC.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to the Office of Disease Prevention and Health Promotion, US Public Health Service, 330 C St SW, Room 2132, Switzer Bldg, Washington, DC 20201 (Dr Woolf).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?