This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

The New McCarthyism in Science

Kenneth J. Rothman, DrPH

JAMA. 1993;269(21):2782-2784.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

MANY scientists and journal editors espouse the principle that a piece of scientific work or criticism is supposed to be judged solely on its scientific merit. In recent years, however, many biomedical journals, JAMA among them,¹ have adopted new policies that require authors to disclose potential conflicts of interest. These disclosures are intended to provide information that is supposed to aid editors and readers in their evaluations of the work: in the words of the former editor of The New England Journal of Medicine, such disclosure "alerts readers to information they may wish to have as they assess the published report."² Examples of scientific misconduct ranging from sloppiness to fraud have been widely publicized; disclosure policies are supposed to reduce these problems by allowing readers to make a more informed and therefore a better interpretation of published work.

Better interpretation of published work is a lofty goal that . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Epidemiology, School of Public Health, and the Department of Medicine, School of Medicine, Boston (Mass) University; and the Department of Epidemiology, Harvard School of Public Health, Boston, Mass. Dr Rothman is the editor of Epidemiology.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Epidemiology, One Newton Executive Park, Newton Lower Falls, MA 02162-1450 (Dr Rothman).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?