You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 269 No. 5, February 3, 1993 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

No Pain, No Gain

Perspectives on Cost Containment

Victor R. Fuchs

JAMA. 1993;269(5):631-633.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THERE is a widespread belief in the United States that expenditures for health care are too high and growing too rapidly. This belief has stimulated numerous policy proposals for "cost containment," including such diverse approaches as managed care, managed competition, insurance company regulation, diagnosis related group reimbursement, global budgets, and expenditure caps. The pros and cons of alternative approaches to cost containment have been debated extensively; I have no intention of proposing still another plan. Instead, I shall offer a framework for thinking about cost containment that is applicable to all possible proposals. In developing this framework I will first consider why public policy should pay any special attention to health expenditures. Two popular explanations—share of GNP (gross national product) and effect on global competitiveness—will be examined and rejected; then three valid explanations will be discussed. Finally, I will show why every approach to cost containment requires pain if there . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Economics and Health Research Policy, Stanford University, and the National Bureau of Economic Research, Stanford, Calif.


Footnotes

This article was presented as The Seventh Annual William Campbell Felch Lecture, sponsored by IMCARE, at the 36th Annual Meeting of the American Society of Internal Medicine, October 15, 1992, Honolulu, Hawaii.

Reprint requests to National Bureau of Economic Research, 204 Junipero Serra Blvd, Stanford, CA 94305-8715 (Mr Fuchs).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1993 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.