This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (26)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

New Technologies, Emerging Obligations

Martin J. Hatlie, JD

JAMA. 1993;270(11):1364-1365.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

First performed in France in 1987 and in the United States in 1988, laparoscopic cholecystectomy rapidly became the prevailing treatment of symptomatic gallstones. The National Institutes of Health estimated that as of September 1992 approximately 15000 surgeons in this country have received some training in the procedure and that 80% of gallbladder removals are now done with this technique.¹ It is notable that no large randomized trials comparing laparoscopic techniques with the established open cholecystectomy procedure have been done or are being planned. Patient demand for the most advanced technology—and its promise of less postoperative pain and shorter recovery time—drove implementation of the modality faster than prospective research could be done.² The data that have emerged indicate that complications occur infrequently, prompting the majority of an American Medical Association Diagnostic and Therapeutic Technology Assessment (DATTA) panel³ and a National Institutes of Health consensus conference¹ to characterize . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Professional Liability & Insurance, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Department of Professional Liability & Insurance, American Medical Association, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610 (Mr Hatlie).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?