This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

An Alternative to Guardianship

Stanley S. Herr, JD, DPhil; Barbara L. Hopkins, MPM, JD

JAMA. 1994;271(13):1017-1022.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

PHYSICIANS, in their concern for informed consent, must sometimes seek substituted consent to treatment. Yet one of those means, guardianship, is a legal institution in danger of collapse. For individuals allegedly incompetent because of advanced age, mental illness, or mental retardation, guardianship is a device for obtaining substituted consent to medical treatment, managing personal property, and gaining plenary authority over virtually every aspect of financial and personal decision making. To its critics, it is a "dangerously burdened and troubled system that regularly puts elderly lives in the hands of others with little or no evidence of necessity, then fails to guard against abuse, theft, and neglect."¹ Guardianships can intrude on fundamental liberty and privacy rights, fail to limit the scope of the guardian's authority, deny procedural safeguards, and lack adequate monitoring and periodic review.^2-4

With informed consent a requirement of both the common law and the Omnibus Budget . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the University of Maryland School of Law, Baltimore (Dr Herr), and Baltimore City Community College (Ms Hopkins).

Footnotes
Reprint requests to the University of Maryland School of Law, 510 W Baltimore St, Baltimore, MD 21201 (Dr Herr).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?