This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Nonfinancial Barriers to Access

Emily Friedman

JAMA. 1994;271(19):1535-1538.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

WHETHER they take the form of managed competition, single-payer systems, regulated multipayer approaches, or expansion of Medicare and/or Medicaid, virtually all health care reform proposals share an underlying principle: that provision of coverage to the uninsured will ensure their access to care. (An exception is direct subsidy of hospital indigent care, which does not encourage structural change or make physician-based primary care available to the uninsured.)

Unfortunately, the track record of American health care, especially in recent times, does not support the belief that coverage is equivalent to access. In the first place, all coverage is not created equal. For some theoretically insured groups, especially the Medicaid population, the availability of physician care is constrained,^1-3 and differences have been found in treatment patterns among patients with Medicare alone, Medicare and private supplemental coverage, and Medicare and Medicaid together.⁴

Physicians' concerns about their financial viability following the introduction of . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Footnotes
Ms Friedman is also contributing editor for Hospitals and Health Networks and the Healthcare Forum Journal and is a contributing writer for Health Alliance Alert and Health Management Quarterly.

Reprint requests to 851 W Gunnison, Unit G, Chicago, IL 60640 (Ms Friedman).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?