You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 271 No. 20, May 25, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (5)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Evaluating Quality Performance in Alternate Health Care Delivery Systems

A Critical Challenge

John T. Kelly, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1994;271(20):1620-1621.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

As the American health care system continues to undergo major structural changes, concerns about the impact of changes in delivery and financing mechanisms on quality of care are rapidly increasing.1 Most federal and state legislative proposals for health care system reform include provisions for evaluating quality.2 "Report cards" on clinical and organizational performance have generated considerable interest as a way to compare quality in alternate delivery systems.3,4 Public- and privatesector efforts to develop effective strategies to evaluate quality and facilitate quality improvement are expanding.

With this attention, quality has become a more visible, but also a more complicated and confusing, issue. Concerns about the adequacy of available approaches to assess performance and measure quality are frequent.5 Debates among policymakers, legislators, researchers, and others about matters such as what are the most important issues related to quality, how to evaluate major dimensions of quality, and how to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Footnotes

At the time this Editorial was written, Dr Kelly was with the Office of Quality Assurance and Medical Review, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill. In May 1994 he became Chief Medical Officer, Senior Vice President of Clinical Information Services, GMIS Inc, Malvern, Pa.

Reprint requests to GMIS Inc, 5 Country View Rd, Malvern, PA 19355 (Dr Kelly).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.