 |
 |

Evaluating Quality Performance in Alternate Health Care Delivery SystemsA Critical Challenge
John T. Kelly, MD, PhD
JAMA. 1994;271(20):1620-1621.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
As the American health care system continues to undergo major structural changes, concerns about the impact of changes in delivery and financing mechanisms on quality of care are rapidly increasing.1 Most federal and state legislative proposals for health care system reform include provisions for evaluating quality.2 "Report cards" on clinical and organizational performance have generated considerable interest as a way to compare quality in alternate delivery systems.3,4 Public- and privatesector efforts to develop effective strategies to evaluate quality and facilitate quality improvement are expanding.
With this attention, quality has become a more visible, but also a more complicated and confusing, issue. Concerns about the adequacy of available approaches to assess performance and measure quality are frequent.5 Debates among policymakers, legislators, researchers, and others about matters such as what are the most important issues related to quality, how to evaluate major dimensions of quality, and how to
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Footnotes
At the time this Editorial was written, Dr Kelly was with the Office of Quality Assurance and Medical Review, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill. In May 1994 he became Chief Medical Officer, Senior Vice President of Clinical Information Services, GMIS Inc, Malvern, Pa.
Reprint requests to GMIS Inc, 5 Country View Rd, Malvern, PA 19355 (Dr Kelly).
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|