This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Terence M. O'Connor, MD
Baylor University Medical Center Dallas, Tex

JAMA. 1994;271(5):343-344.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The article by Drs Arieff and Ayus¹ on the complications of operative hysteroscopy provides yet another account of potentially life-threatening complications of a procedure that is gaining popularity. At Physicians' Daysurgery Center, an outpatient surgical unit in Dallas, Tex, we began performing hysteroscopic surgery in May 1992. Over the course of the first 7 months, 49 of these procedures were done. It became apparent that there was a high rate of complications related to fluid absorption, including three patients who developed pulmonary edema.

As serial sodium determinations are a late indicator of fluid absorption and usually not available in a timely manner, and measurement of instillation and recovery of irrigant are difficult and unreliable, other methods need to be looked at to measure intraoperative fluid absorption. Investigators in Sweden have used ethanol-containing irrigation fluid, combined with end-tidal breath alcohol analysis for TURP.^2-5 Hulten et al¹ showed . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?