This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Noel D. List, MD
University of Health Sciences/ The Chicago Medical School North Chicago, Ill

JAMA. 1994;272(11):847.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Geriatrics must be designated as primary care. We need trained primary care specialists delivering effective, cost-efficient care to the rapidly expanding elderly population, which uses a disproportionate share of health care dollars. Trained geriatricians, who spend more time with the complex problems of patients and families, appear to reduce health care costs by managing the interdisciplinary system more efficiently.¹ Because of this, geriatricians are in demand by managed health care groups at excellent salaries. That does not diminish our responsibility to train more general internists and family practitioners in geriatrics because geriatrics comprises more than half of most primary care practice.

Unfortunately, education in geriatrics has low priority. Few medical schools and medicine residency training programs have sufficient geriatric content or requirements.² It has been reported that the American Board of Internal Medicine looked with favor on the recent recommendations by an Institute of Medicine . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Footnotes
Edited by Drummond Rennie, MD, Deputy Editor (West), and Margaret A. Winker, MD, Senior Editor.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?