 |
 |

JAMA Editorial Position and US Health System Reform
Robert F. Schilling, MD
University of Wisconsin Madison
JAMA. 1994;272(21):1655-1656.
 |
 |
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
 |
 |
To the Editor.
—Your cogent Editorial1 about health care system reform has inspired a lighter analysis of this major problem I have entitled "The Verities From Alice in Nimbyland" (with apologies to L. Carroll).
- We have a moral obligation to provide universal access to high-quality health care, but thou shalt not raise my taxes.
- We absolutely must control health care costs, but thou shalt not ration care for my family.
- We must increase the number of primary care physicians, but thou shalt not restrict my free access to the specialists I choose.
- We must curtail the use of expensive, unproven new technology, but thou shalt not restrict my freedom to choose the tests and treatment my doctor and I want.
- We must reduce the cost of drugs, but thou shalt not question my choosing a new, expensive drug even though it has not been shown to be superior.
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
CiteULike Connotea Del.icio.us Digg Reddit Technorati Twitter
What's this?
|