This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Norman A. Clemens, MD
Cleveland, Ohio

Paul W. Mosher, MD
Albany, NY

JAMA. 1994;272(22):1721.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Dr Somerfeld-Ziskind¹ begins a recent review of a book on "biological psychiatry" with the gratuitous sentence: "Now that psychoanalysis is on the wane, inevitably earlier opinions in psychiatry will resurface." While it may be comforting to some to repeat the myth that psychoanalysis is in some sort of decline, the facts about psychoanalysis support exactly the opposite conclusion.

In the United States, the membership of the American Psychoanalytic Association has gone from 1880 in 1974, to 2828 in 1984 to 3050 in 1994 (oral communication, American Psychoanalytic Association, August 1994). Most of these members are physicians. In addition, the membership of Division 39 of the American Psychological Association, the section concerned with clinical psychoanalysis, has risen from 1950 in 1984 to 3801 in 1994 (oral communication, American Psychological Association, August 1994).

While surveys over these years have shown a slight decline in the number of psychoanalytic . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?