You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 272 No. 23, December 21, 1994 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Council Report
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Disputes Between Medical Supervisors and Trainees

Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association; John Glasson, MD; Durham, NC; Charles W. Plows, MD; Oscar W. Clarke, MD; Victoria Ruff, MD; Drew Fuller; Craig H. Kliger, MD; George T. Wilkins, Jr, MD; James H. Cosgriff, Jr, MD; Robert M. Tenery, Jr, MD; David Orentlicher, MD, JD; Karey M. Harwood; Jeff Leslie

JAMA. 1994;272(23):1861-1865.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE RELATIONSHIP between medical students, resident physicians, and their supervisors is a major factor determining the quality of medical education. For this relationship to be most conducive to learning, medical supervisors and trainees must communicate openly, share clearly defined conceptions of their respective roles in patient care and within the larger teacher-learner relationship,1 and interact with each other and with patients in "a climate of trust and concern."2 Fostering such a relationship is an important goal of medical education. Unfortunately, evidence suggests that too often this idealistic model is not realized in practice.3-11 When disputes arise between medical students, resident physicians, and supervising physicians, they often can be resolved through open and honest communication and informal negotiation.12 When disputes cannot be resolved by the individual parties, resolution may require recourse to formal mechanisms that follow the requirements of due process. Due process for fair resolution of disputes between medical students, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Anaheim, Calif,(Vice Chair); Gallipolis, Ohio; Columbus, Ohio; Gainesville, Fla; Los Angeles, Calif; Edwardsville, Ill; Buffalo, NY; Dallas, Tex; Chicago, Ill (Secretary and Staff Author); Somerville, Mass (Staff Associate); New Haven, Conn (Staff Associate and Staff Author).

From the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill.


Footnotes

This report was adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association on December 7, 1993, and was subsequently revised in response to comments received from the peer reviewers.

Reprint requests to Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610 (David Orentlicher, MD, JD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1994 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.