This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Ethel Weinberg, MD; Patricia O'Sullivan, EdD
Baystate Health Systems Springfield, Mass

JAMA. 1995;273(10):771-772.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—Dr Sperry is correct in noting that we used average costs rather than marginal costs in our discussion of replacement costs for teaching at nonuniversity hospitals.

Marginal costs seemed inappropriate for at least two reasons. First, many university hospitals could not accommodate all of the medical students, particularly in obstetrics and pediatrics. Other locations with attendant new administrative costs would be sought. Second, much of the teaching of third-year medical students is in very small groups. For example, the highest mean daily hours was for supervising students in the outpatient setting. In this situation the teacher-to-student ratio was only 1 to 21. It would be false to assume that the university faculty would simply absorb the new students without adding faculty costs. The latter represent almost two thirds of the costs in our study. It is certainly true that there is inequality of cost structures in different centers, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?