You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 12, March 22, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (25)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Economics and Efficacy in Choosing Oral Anticoagulants or Aspirin After Myocardial Infarction

John A. Cairns, MD, FRCPC; Barbara A. Markham, MBA

JAMA. 1995;273(12):965-967.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Long-term antithrombotic therapy with oral anticoagulants or antiplatelet agents for survivors of acute myocardial infarction (AMI) is widely prescribed and has been evaluated in many clinical trials.1 An overview in 19702 suggested a modest benefit of anticoagulation therapy, but—although oral anticoagulants have been widely used in some European countries—their use in North America is limited. More recently, the Sixty Plus,3 Warfarin Re-infarct Study,4 and the Anticoagulants in the Secondary Prevention of Events in Coronary Thrombosis (ASPECT)5 trials have all shown statistically significant reductions of clinically important vascular outcomes by anticoagulant treatment compared with placebo.

See also p 925.

In this issue of JAMA, van Bergen et al6 report on an economic analysis of anticoagulant treatment in the Netherlands that exemplifies the rather unusual win-win situation of increased efficacy and reduced cost. The ASPECT study randomized 3404 patients within 6 weeks of their AMIs to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Medicine (Dr Cairns), Clinical Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Cairns and Ms Markham), and the Centre for Health Economics and Policy Analysis (Ms Markham), McMaster University, Hamilton, Ontario.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Department of Medicine, Room 3W10, McMaster University Medical Centre, 1200 Main St W, Hamilton, Ontario, Canada L8N 3Z5 (Dr Cairns).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.