 |
|
Changes in Dutch Opinions on Active Euthanasia, 1966 Through 1991
Paul J. van der Maas, MD, PhD;
Loes Pijnenborg, MD;
Johannes J. M. van Delden, MD, PhD
JAMA. 1995;273(18):1411-1414.
|
|
| Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings. |
|
|
|
THE NETHERLANDS appears to have a worldwide reputation for tolerant policies on controversial issues such as abortion, drug abuse, and euthanasia. In a comparative survey of 15 countries, including the United States and Canada, the Dutch had by far the most permissive orientation.1 "Tolerant" in this context has positive connotations for some and negative for others, who interpret this tolerance as a loss of fundamental values that inevitably leads to a disintegration of society.
Policies must have at least some basis in public opinion and in opinions of the relevant professional groups, especially in an extremely value-laden topic such as active euthanasia. Euthanasia involves such values as the sanctity of life and human self-determination, as well as medical-professional ethics that may be seen as more or less derived from such values. In this article, we examine the development of public opinion on the issue of active euthanasia and the
. . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]
Author Affiliations
From the Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam (Drs van der Maas, Pijnenborg, and van Delden), and Center for Bioethics and Health Law, Utrecht University (Dr van Delden), Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
Footnotes
Edited by Annette Flanagin, RN, MA, Associate Senior Editor.
Corresponding author: Paul J. van der Maas, MD, PhD, Department of Public Health, Erasmus University Rotterdam, PO Box 1738, 3000 DR Rotterdam, the Netherlands.
 CiteULike  Connotea  Del.icio.us  Digg  Reddit  Technorati  Twitter
What's this?
|
