This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Martin G. Wertkin, MD
Tarrytown, NY

JAMA. 1995;273(19):1487-1488.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The article by Messrs Bovbjerg and Petronis¹ on the predictive value of physicians' malpractice claims experience and the excellent Commentary by Mr Smarr² fail to consider an important determinant of a physician's risk of incurring a malpractice claim, namely, practice volume.

It stands to reason that the more patients a physician treats, the more likely that physician is to have a bad result or unanticipated outcome, to encounter an angry or litigious patient, or to make a mistake. The larger the practice, the more the "exposure," and this exposure increases with each subsequent year in practice. As one of my surgery professors used to half joke: "Any surgeon who has been in practice 10 or more years and has not been sued simply isn't busy enough."

It would be interesting to factor practice volume into the odds ratios of Bovbjerg and Petronis. If there is a . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?