You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 2, January 11, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (19)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

When Is CPR Futile?

Ann Alpers, JD; Bernard Lo, MD

JAMA. 1995;273(2):156-158.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The root sense of "futility," with its immutable failure and inherent frustration, derives from ancient mythology. According to Ovid, the daughters of Danaus were condemned to draw water in leaky buckets from which the liquid would inevitably spill.1 If cardiopulmonary resuscitation (CPR) is literally futile, a do-not-attempt-resuscitation (DNAR) order is appropriate, even without the agreement of the patient or surrogate. An example in which CPR would be as futile as transporting water in a leaky bucket is a 72-year-old man with progressive septic shock, renal failure, obtundation, and respiratory failure despite 7 days of intensive care. Maximal treatment for the underlying condition has already failed, and there is no plausible pathophysiological mechanism by which CPR would restore adequate circulation.2,3 However, many situations are not as clear-cut, and physicians may disagree with their colleagues and their patients over whether the leak is so severe that it would be pointless . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Program in Medical Ethics (Drs Alpers and Lo), and the Robert Wood Johnson Clinical Scholars Program (Dr Lo), the Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, and the Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, San Francisco.


Footnotes

Reprint requests to Program in Medical Ethics, Center for AIDS Prevention Studies, Division of General Internal Medicine, University of California, 521 Parnassus Ave, Room C 126, San Francisco, CA 94143-0903 (Dr Lo).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.