This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

What to Do?

Charles L. Loprinzi, MD

JAMA. 1995;273(23):1877-1878.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The article by Virgo et al¹ in this issue of JAMA examines the question, "What is appropriate follow-up for colorectal cancer patients treated with an intent to cure?" The authors approach this topic by summarizing 11 different strategies and then dealing with financial aspects of proposed follow-up testing recommendations. While such financial considerations are important, there are other important factors to be considered in determining appropriate follow-up practices, these primarily being quantity and quality of life.

See also p 1837.

There are few data regarding the influence of follow-up strategies on the quality of life of cancer survivors. While some will argue that patients feel reassured when test results are normal and that frequent testing will improve their quality of life, there are many patients whose quality of life is negatively affected for days to weeks in anticipation of upcoming testing procedures, during subsequent procedures performed because of false-positive . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, Minn.

Footnotes
Reprint requests to Department of Medical Oncology, Mayo Clinic, 200 First St SW, Rochester, MN 55905 (Dr Loprinzi).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?