You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 273 No. 4, January 25, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Council Report
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Ethical Issues in Managed Care

Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association

John Glasson, MD; Charles W. Plows, MD; Oscar W. Clarke, MD; Victoria Ruff, MD; Drew Fuller; Craig H. Kliger, MD; George T. Wilkins, Jr, MD; James H. Cosgriff, Jr, MD; Robert M. Tenery, Jr, MD; Kirk B. Johnson, JD; David Orentlicher, MD, JD; Karey M. Harwood; Jeff Leslie

JAMA. 1995;273(4):330-335.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

A PRIMARY concern of medical ethicists for some time has been the absence of any meaningful analysis of the impact of health care delivery marketplace changes and current legislative reforms on the essential tenets of the physician-patient relationship. Although President Clinton's original reform proposal addressed in broad terms the ethical imperatives supporting universal access, it left virtually unexamined the more fundamental question of the role of the physician in a reformed system in which the incentives are dramatically changed and budgets determine the amount of health care spending and services.

See also pp 323 and 338.

In June 1990, the Council issued a report, "Financial Incentives to Limit Care: Financial Implications for HMOs and IPAs,"1 which described the financial incentives that managed care plans offer physicians to limit their provision of care. The report concluded that patient welfare must remain the first concern of physicians working in health maintenance . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Durham, NC, (Chair); Anaheim, Calif,(Vice Chair); Gallipolis, Ohio; Columbus, Ohio; Gainesville, Fla; Los Angeles, Calif; Edwardsville, III; Buffalo, NY; Dallas, Tex; Chicago, III (Senior Vice President and General Counsel and Staff Author); Chicago, Ill (Secretary and Staff Author); Somerville, Mass (Staff Associate); New Haven, Conn (Staff Associate and Staff Author).

From the Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, Chicago, Ill.


Footnotes

This report was adopted by the House of Delegates of the American Medical Association on June 14,1994, and subsequently revised in response to comments received from the peer reviewers.

Reprint requests to Council on Ethical and Judicial Affairs, American Medical Association, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL 60610 (David Orentlicher, MD, JD).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.