This Article  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Gerald B. Hickson, MD; Ellen Wright Clayton, MD, JD; Stephen S. Entman, MD; Cynthia S. Miller
Vanderbilt University School of Medicine Nashville, Tenn

Penny B. Githens, MS
Indiana University Indianapolis

Kathryn Whetten-Goldstein, PhD, MPH; Frank Sloan, PhD
Duke University Durham, NC

JAMA. 1995;274(1):23.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—The Fallon Clinic's experience is encouraging and suggests that it is possible to enhance patient perceptions of the interpersonal skills of physicians, perhaps even those with high malpractice claims experience. One possible explanation is that the process of obtaining feedback from peers led the clinicians to appreciate the problems so that they could address them. Another is that the training program actually imparted new skill. Understanding the relative importance of peer-provided feedback and providing physicians education concerning the skill to correct identified problems is needed in order to design education strategies that sustain behavioral changes over time.

Dr Weyrauch's hypotheses are important, and we would argue that all the interpersonal skills in the world will not heal a physician-patient relationship marred by bias and condescension. Nonetheless, to the extent we looked, we did not find evidence that patients were more likely to see the high-frequency physicians as biased . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?