You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 13, October 4, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Citing articles on Web of Science (18)
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

ECASS: Lessons for Future Thrombolytic Stroke Trials

Marc Fisher, MD; Michael S. Pessin, MD; Anthony J. Furian, MD

JAMA. 1995;274(13):1058-1059.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The European Cooperative Acute Stroke Study (ECASS)1 marks an important milestone along the road toward an effective therapy for acute ischemic stroke. Well-conceived and performed, ECASS is the first large, randomized, blinded study of high-dose intravenous recombinant tissue plasminogen activator (rt-PA) designed to determine if this thrombolytic therapy is efficacious and safe in acute stroke patients. More than 600 patients were recruited within 6 hours of stroke onset at 75 centers in 14 countries, demonstrating that large multinational acute stroke therapy trials are feasible and can accrue patients more rapidly than anticipated. Most importantly, current hypotheses about preventing the conversion of ischemic tissue to completed infarction suggest that early initiation of thrombolytic or neuroprotective therapy2 is essential. ECASS and the earlier monoganglioside GM1 trial3 demonstrate that early initiation is possible.

See also p 1017.

Disappointingly, the intention-to-treat analysis for clinical efficacy revealed no benefit for rt-PA intervention; . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Department of Neurology, the Medical Center of Central Massachusetts and the University of Massachusetts Medical School, Worcester (Dr Fisher); New England Medical Center and Tufts University School of Medicine, Boston, Mass (Dr Pessin); and the Cleveland (Ohio) Clinic Foundation (Dr Furian).


Footnotes

Dr Fisher is a consultant to Cambridge Neuroscience and Lorex (both consultancies are related to neuroprotective substances); Dr Pessin is a consultant to Cambridge Neuroscience (neuroprotective substances) and Abbott Laboratories (intraarterial thrombolysis trial).

Reprint requests to Medical Center of Central Massachusetts, 119 Belmont St, Worcester, MA 01605 (Dr Fisher).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.