You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 274 No. 18, November 8, 1995 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Insulin Resistance and Non—insulin-dependent Diabetes

J. Nico D. de Neeling, PhD
Institute for Research in Extramural Medicine Amsterdam, the Netherlands

JAMA. 1995;274(18):1426.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Dr Pimenta and colleagues1 state that they tested the hypothesis that insulin resistance precedes impaired beta-cell function in people genetically predisposed to develop non—insulin-dependent diabetes mellitus (NIDDM), but their study could not address their primary hypothesis.

First, Pimenta et al took care to match the control subjects to the subjects with a first-degree NIDDM relative for body mass index. But rather than body mass index simply being the "environmental factor,"1 it seems plausible that there is some genetic constitution that, in the presence of excess energy intake or diminished physical activity, manifests itself phenotypically as hyperinsulinemia and obesity.2,3 Thus, matching for obesity implies also matching, at least partially, for the insulin-resistant genotype, which clearly undermines the validity of the comparison between index and control groups with respect to the degree of genetically determined insulin sensitivity. Second, from the data on the age of the study . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1995 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.