This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Nigel J. Gay, MSc
Public Health Laboratory Service Communicable Disease Surveillance Centre London, England

D. James Nokes, PhD
University of Warwick Coventry, England

JAMA. 1996;275(17):1311-1312.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—We welcome the vision of Dr de Quadros and colleagues¹ in proposing a coordinated strategy for the elimination of measles from the Americas and would endorse their basic approach. However, while the combination of experience, common sense, and guesswork used to develop the strategy has so far proved successful, we would argue that the design is not optimal and that it would benefit from judicious use of the well-established theory of infectious disease transmission.^2,3 This is particularly necessary if the strategy is to be adopted in other regions.

Specifically, the criterion used to determine the time interval between follow-up campaigns should be revised. Their calculation is based on the assertion that when the number of susceptible children is equal to the number of children in 1 birth cohort it is "almost certainly" enough to permit an outbreak to occur. No evidence is provided to support . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?