This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Brad Randall, MD
University of South Dakota School of Medicine Sioux Falls

JAMA. 1996;275(18):1399-1400.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Dr Pinner and colleagues¹ should be congratulated for devising a more meaningful way to use International Classification of Diseases, Ninth Revision (ICD-9) coding to extract the impact of infectious diseases on our national mortality data. Their data clearly show an increasing trend of deaths associated with infectious disease.

However, like any study based on death certificate data, the hard numbers from their study are based on a foundation of sand. The accuracy of any given death certificate is questionable at best^2-4 and is ultimately unknown. The dwindling US autopsy rate further confounds the accuracy of death certificate data.⁵

I review large numbers of completed death certificates, and I find that attending physicians often omit the true underlying cause of death and list instead the complications of the underlying cause that posed the most vexing clinical problems. In how many cases from the article by . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?