You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 275 No. 24, June 26, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Linguistic Ability in Early Life and Alzheimer Disease in Late Life-Reply

David A. Snowdon, PhD; Lydia H. Greiner, BSN; David R. Wekstein, PhD; Deborah Danner, PhD; William R. Markesbery, MD
University of Kentucky Lexington

Susan J. Kemper, PhD
University of Kansas Lawrence

James A. Mortimer, PhD
University of South Florida Tampa

JAMA. 1996;275(24):1879.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—Dr Massie and Mr Miranda raise issues that we considered when investigating the relationship between writing style demonstrated in autobiographies written at an average age of 22 years and cognitive function and Alzheimer disease assessed an average of 58 years later. We found a strong relationship between low idea (proposition) density in autobiographies written in early life and poor cognitive function and Alzheimer disease in late life.

In agreement with Massie, the correlation of density of positive emotion words with idea density was 0.26 (P=.01), and the correlation of density of negative emotion words with idea density was 0.19 (P=.07). However, the correlation with cognitive function, as measured by the Mini-Mental State Examination score in late life, was 0.66 (P=.001) for idea density, 0.19 (P=.07) for the density of positive emotion words, and 0.19 (P=.07) for the density of negative emotion words. While . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.