This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

A Proposal for Action

César Chelala, MD, PhD

JAMA. 1996;275(7):559-560.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

One of the oft-neglected questions in the debate about Cuba is whether policies that adversely affect the health of Cubans should be used in the US government's efforts to force changes in the Castro government.

Following the Cuban revolution of 1959, health and education services improved significantly in Cuba as a result of the Castro government's decision to make health and education priorities. Along with Costa Rica, Cuba achieved some of the best health indicators among the Latin American and Caribbean countries.¹ Those gains are now being reversed, as a result in part of the continuing embargo against Cuba, which will be even stricter if the Helms-Burton bill is finally made into law.

Since 1962, the United States has maintained an economic embargo against Cuba. Because of political and economic support from the former Soviet Union, this embargo had only a limited impact for many years. In 1992, the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Footnotes
Corresponding author: César Chelala, MD, PhD, 390 W Broadway, New York, NY 10012.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?