This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

JAMA. 1996;276(13):1093-1099.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Medicine has long affirmed a two-fold commitment to the humane arts: first, and always foremost, there is the obligation to provide humane service. Second, there is medicine's commitment to humane learning, a centuries-old undertaking that includes knowledge of the natural sciences and of those "liberal" disciplines chiefly represented by history, philosophy, literature, and the social sciences. While attending the sick remains the physician's primary duty, it is this latter knowledge, embodied in the liberal arts, that has secured medicine's traditional status alongside law and theology as one of the three learned professions.¹

In this century, medicine's increasingly technocentric focus has threatened that status. On an ever larger scale, the profession has indulged its scientific side, and while none can doubt the success resulting from that emphasis, there is concern nonetheless that it comes at the expense of medicine's humanity—that while physicians have grown more proficient, they have also become narrow and less caring.² . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?