You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 276 No. 5, August 7, 1996 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Global Climate Controversy

John S. Gray, PhD, DSc
University of Oslo Blindern, Norway

Michael Depledge, DSc, PhD
University of Plymouth Plymouth, England

Anthony Knap, DSc, PhD
Bermuda Biological Station for Research St George's West, Bermuda

JAMA. 1996;276(5):372-373.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The article by Dr Patz and colleagues1 suggests a link between outbreaks of cholera and marine algal blooms. We believe such a link is speculative in the extreme. Cockburn and Cassanos2 first suggested that seasonal fluctuations in cholera were associated with growths of bluegreen algae in freshwater ponds. Oppenheimer et al3 postulated that Vibrio cholerae was retained within the mucous sheath of the alga, was released into the water, and multiplied vigorously in the rich nutrients derived from the decayed bloom. The pond water was then used by humans, and cholera spread. Yet these authors performed no statistical analyses. The data presented showed that the number of cholera cases increased from just above zero in July and August to a peak of more than 700 between October and November, while the water temperature decreased from 32°C to 20°C. The peak algal bloom was 290 . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1996 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.