This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Citing articles on Web of Science (26)  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Victor R. Fuchs, PhD

JAMA. 1997;277(11):920-921.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The ascendancy of managed care and the concomitant stampede to consolidation of health care organizations through mergers and acquisitions are transforming the body and soul of American medicine. Not long ago, insured patients could choose freely among available providers, physicians' decisions were rarely questioned by insurers, most physicians practiced solo or in small groups and were reimbursed fee-for-service, and most hospitals were stand-alone organizations reimbursed retrospectively according to their average costs. Today under managed care, purchasers selectively contract with providers, patients face financial penalties if they seek care "out of plan," fees and prices are negotiated in advance, physicians' decisions are subject to outside review and management, and providers often share in the insurance risk. Moreover, the locus of care has shifted dramatically toward consolidated organizations.

What explains the triumph of managed care and consolidation over traditional modes of finance and organization? Will current trends continue, and if so, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Departments of Economics and Health Research and Policy, Stanford University, Stanford, Calif.

Footnotes
Reprints: Victor R. Fuchs, PhD, National Bureau of Economic Research, 204 Junipero Serra Blvd, Stanford, CA 94305.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?