You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 277 No. 15, April 16, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Related letter
 •Related article
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Assessing, Controlling, and Assuring the Quality of Medical Information on the Internet

Caveant Lector et Viewor—Let the Reader and Viewer Beware

William M. Silberg; George D. Lundberg, MD; Robert A. Musacchio, PhD

JAMA. 1997;277(15):1244-1245.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Health care professionals and patients alike should view with equal parts delight and concern the exponential growth of the Internet (the Net), and especially its graphical, user-friendly subset, the World Wide Web (the Web), as a medical information delivery tool.1,2 Delight because the Internet hosts a large number of high-quality medical resources and poses seemingly endless opportunities to inform, teach, and connect professionals and patients alike. Concern because the fulfillment of that promise remains discouragingly distant. Technical glitches aside, when it comes to medical information, the Internet too often resembles a cocktail conversation rather than a tool for effective health care communication and decision making.

See also p 1258.

The problem is not too little information but too much, vast chunks of it incomplete, misleading, or inaccurate, and not only in the medical arena.3,4 The Net—and especially the Web—has the potential to become the world's largest vanity press. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Footnotes

Mr Silberg is Editorial Director, New Media Office, Scientific Information and Multimedia Group (e-mail: Bill_Silberg@ama-assn.org); Dr Lundberg is Editor, JAMA (e-mail: George_Lundberg@ama-assn.org); and Dr Musacchio is Vice President of Information Resources and Chief Information Officer (e-mail: Robert_Musacchio @ama-assn.org), American Medical Association, Chicago, III.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?

RELATED LETTER

Clinic-Based Health Information Web Site for International Travelers
John C. Licciardone, Kathryn M. Herron, Anthony J. Clark, and Douglas Squires
JAMA. 1998;280(15):1310.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  

RELATED ARTICLE

Applicability and Quality of Information for Answering Clinical Questions on the Web
William R. Hersh, Paul N. Gorman, and Lynetta S. Sacherek
JAMA. 1998;280(15):1307-1308.
EXTRACT | FULL TEXT  






HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.