You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 277 No. 7, February 19, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Treatment of Patients With Non-insulin-dependent Diabetes With the Implantable Insulin Pump-Reply

Christopher D. Saudek, MD
Johns Hopkins University Baltimore, Md for the Department of Veterans Affairs Implantable Insulin Pump Study Group

JAMA. 1997;277(7):530.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—Dr Pazart would like to define efficacy in terms of success rate in achieving perfectly normal glycemia. Of note, he quotes only half of our stated treatment objective, which was not only to achieve normal blood glucose levels but to do so "while avoiding clinical hypoglycemia." These were, in essence, treatment targets. If the success rate is measured in achievement of perfectly normal hemoglobin A1c (not, of course, assuring uniformly normal blood glucose levels), it was attained in 29 of our 121 subjects (16 who received the implantable insulin pump, 13 who received multiple-dose insulin). But achieving euglycemia was limited, as always, by the risk of hypoglycemia. Therefore, we reject dichotomizing the success rate or defining it in terms of normal blood glucose. To do so implies that diabetes treatment is unsuccessful in virtually every case, although there is ample reason to believe that less than normal glycemia is, . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.