You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 277 No. 7, February 19, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Risk-Adjustment Methods Based on Health Status and Functional Status-Reply

Jinnet B. Fowles, PhD
HealthSystem Minnesota Minneapolis

JAMA. 1997;277(7):531.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—Dr Allman suggests that self-reported survey information should be used for risk adjustment for persons older than 65 years. He suggests that self-reported functional status measures perform just as well, if not better, than claims-based systems.

Although the SF-36 model did predict health care expenditures within 5% of actual expenses for a higher proportion of "high-risk" groups than did adjustment using ambulatory care groups, we found that performance of risk-adjustment systems varied depending on the measure of predictive accuracy chosen. Taking this factor into account and considering issues of administrative feasibility, we concluded that a claims-based or encounter-based system is preferable to a survey-based method.

Allman correctly suggests that some issues of administrative feasibility, such as surveying illiterate and non-English-speaking subjects, can be overcome. Even so, significant feasibility problems remain for survey-based risk adjusters. For example, the suggestion that SF-36 data be collected every 5 years does not correspond to . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.