This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Nelson Borelli, MD
Chicago, Ill

JAMA. 1997;277(9):712.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The Editorial by Dr Grodin and Mr Annas¹ is a compilation of the wrongdoings of the Nazi physicians, including the Nazi view that certain racial and ethnic groups are subhuman and then using that view as an excuse to manipulate those groups; their agreement to treat the racial "sickness" that threatened the health of German volk; and their medicalization of social and political problems. Although the authors state that "the fact that we are not Nazis does not mean we are immune from seduction by social, political, and economic organizations that seek to corrupt medicine for their own agendas," they fail to even mention the most flagrant violation of the first Nuremberg principle that exists in US medicine today: "The voluntary consent of the human subject is absolutely essential."² The US law and organized medicine still practice involuntary intervention of the mentally ill. Nuremberg's principles . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?