You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 278 No. 10, September 10, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Likelihood Ratios to Determine 'Does This Patient Have Appendicitis?': Comment and Clarification

Klaus Witt, MD, PhD
University of Copenhagen Copenhagen, Denmark

Marjukka Mäkelä, MD, PhD, MSc
National Research and Development Center for Welfare and Health Helsinki, Finland

Ole Olsen
The Nordic Cochrane Centre Copenhagen, Denmark

JAMA. 1997;278(10):819.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—At the Second Nordic Workshop on How to Practice Evidence-Based HealthCare, the article by Dr Wagner and colleagues entitled "Does This Patient Have Appendicitis?"1 was used as the basis for the discussion groups on the issue of how to use an article about a diagnostic test.

The sensitivities and specificities listed in Table 3 of that article do not correspond with the listed likelihood ratios (LRs) if we use the usual method of LR calculation.2,3 For example, the first LRs for right lower quadrant pain in Table 3 are given as 7.31 to 8.46 (positive LR) and 0 to 0.28 (negative LR). When calculated using the sensitivity and specificity data given, the positive LR, calculated as (sensitivity/[1-specifity]), becomes 0.81/0.47, or 1.72; the negative LR ([1-sensitivity]/specificity) is 0.19/0.53, or 0.36. Similar lower LRs were found for the entire Table 3.

Formula

This means that the power . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.