You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 278 No. 14, October 8, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Editorials
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Endomyocardial Biopsies

An Early Warning System for Chronic Transplant Arteriopathy

H. Thomas Aretz, MD; Robert B. Colvin, MD

JAMA. 1997;278(14):1197-1198.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Short-term survival of cardiac allografts has increased markedly because of surveillance by protocol endomyocardial biopsies and improvements in immunosuppression, which have largely prevented graft loss from acute rejection. Currently, 85% of allograft recipients survive for 1 year, and 70% can expect to survive 5 years.1 Despite this progress, chronic cardiac allograft arteriopathy (also known as chronic rejection, graft vascular disease, or accelerated atherosclerosis) remains a substantial and intractable obstacle to long-term survival, accounting for 21% to 30% of deaths.2,3 The other major complications relate to the immunosuppression treatment itself (malignancy, infections).

See also p 1169.

Although graft atherosclerotic disease shares certain aspects with native coronary atherosclerosis, including dysfunctional endothelium with subsequent endothelial—inflammatory cell interaction, there are significant differences in the morphology, distribution, and most certainly pathogenesis.4 The introduction of intravascular ultrasound has also shown that the process is much more prevalent and occurs earlier than had been . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Department of Pathology, Massachusetts General Hospital, Boston.


Footnotes

Corresponding author: H. Thomas Aretz, MD, Massachusetts General Hospital, Immunopathology Unit, Cox 5, 100 Blossom St, Boston, MA 02114 (e-mail: aretz@helix.mgh.harvard.edu).



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.