You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 278 No. 15, October 15, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  From the JAMA Web Sites: HIV/AIDS Information Center
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Cytomegalovirus Retinitis Treatment

Abstract and Commentary

William G. Powderly, MD

JAMA. 1997;278(15):1287.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Background:

Sustained-release, intraocular implants that deliverganciclovir are an alternative method for the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis in patients with the acquired immunodeficiency sydrome (AIDS).

Methods:

We conducted a randomized study of 188 patients with AIDS and newly diagnosed cytomegalovirus retinitis. The patients were randomly assigned to treatment with an implant delivering 1µg of ganciclovir per hour, an implant delivering 2µg of ganciclovir per hour, or intravenous ganciclovir. The primary outcome we studied was propression of cytomegalovirus retinitis.

Results:

The median time to propression of retinitis was 221 days with the 1-µg-per-hour implant (75 eyes), 191 days with ganciclovir administered intravenously (76 eyes; P<0.001). The risk of progression of retinitis was almost three times as great among patients treated with intrave-nous ganciclovir as among those treated with a ganciclovir implant (risk ratio, 2.8; P<0.001). However, the risk of disease in the initially uninvolved eye was lower with intravenous ganciclovir than with a ganciclovir implant (risk ratio, 0.5; P=0.19). Patients treated with intravenous ganciclovir were also less likely to the have extraocular cytomegalovirus infection (0, vs. 10.3 percentin the two implant groups; P=0.04).

Conclusions:

For the treatment of cytomegalovirus retinitis, thesustained releasse ganciclovir implant is more effective than intravenous ganciclovir, but patients treated with a ganciclovir implant alone remain at greater risk for the development of cytomegalovirus disease outside of the treated eye. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Associate Professor of Medicine Co-Director, Division of Infectious Diseases Washington University School of Medicine St Louis, Mo



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.