This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

William L. Lupatkin, MD, PhD
Morristown, NJ

JAMA. 1997;278(23):2065-2066.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—The articles by Dr Liu and colleagues¹ and Dr Edmonson and colleagues² and the Commentary by Dr Braveman and colleagues³ raise interesting questions and alluded to several issues without making them explicit. Hidden in the descriptions of the details of the statistical methods and statistical power in various conflicting studies is the underlying fact that the differences sought are insignificant from the standpoint of any one infant or mother. The Commentary by Braveman et al points out that there is more to clinical practice than is available in studies of outcomes and urges that policymakers recognize that fact.

To be useful either clinically or as tools for the formation of public policy, studies of outcome have to choose measures appropriately. Certainly, if early discharge were causing severe medical harm to infants or their mothers, that practice would have to be stopped immediately, but it is intuitively obvious . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?