This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Edward O. Laumann, PhD; Chiristopher M. Masi, MD; Ezra W. Zuckerman, MA
University of Chicago Chicago, Ill

JAMA. 1997;278(3):203.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

In Reply.

—Collectively, the letters commenting on our article on circumcision are a microcosm of the highly contentious state of opinion on the wisdom of mass neonatal circumcision in the United States. Most of the authors make useful reference to other studies that bear on evaluating the impact of circumcision on such issues as penile sensitivity, sexual satisfaction, and transmission of other diseases to sex partners (eg, cervical cancer) that we could not examine because of the limitations on clinical data gathering imposed by a broad-based population survey such as ours.

However, we take strong exception to Dr Schoen's observation that the survey method is simply inapplicable because of its invalidity for studying STDs. We acknowledged in our article the limitations of self-reported STDs from a lay population, especially with respect to underreporting becaused of selective recall, lack of awareness and of diagnosis of asymptomatic disease, and the avoidance of social stigma. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?