You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 278 No. 4, July 23, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Commentary
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Early Discharge and Evidence-based Practice

Good Science and Good Judgment

Paula Braveman, MD, MPH; Woodie Kessel, MD, MPH; Susan Egerter, PhD; Julius Richmond, MD

JAMA. 1997;278(4):334-336.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Two articles in this issue of THE JOURNAL reach apparently conflicting conclusions regarding the safety of the short postpartum hospital stays that are now—and are likely to remain—standard for apparently well mothers and newborns. Both studies, 1 from Washington State1 and 1 from Wisconsin,2used case-control designs and large secondary databases to examine the association between early discharge and neonatal readmissions. Although this question has been explored before, few studies have been so large or have addressed limitations so skillfully. Interpreting the implications of these studies and their seemingly contradictory conclusions raises difficult issues about science and society; the issues are not unique to these studies.

Using linked birth certificate and hospital discharge abstracts from eligible vaginal singleton live births in Washington State from 1991 through 1994, Liu and colleagues2 investigated whether "early" (<30 hours after delivery) compared with "later" (30-78 hours after delivery) discharge increased the risk . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

From the Departments of Family and Community Medicine (Drs Egerter and Braveman) and Epidemiology and Biostatistics (Dr Braveman), University of California, San Francisco; the Division of Science, Education, and Analysis, Maternal Child and Health Bureau, Health Resources and Services Administration, US Department of Health and Human Services, Washington, DC (Dr Kessel); and the Department of Social Medicine, Harvard Medical School, Boston, Mass (Dr Richmond).


Footnotes

Reprints: Paula Braveman, MD, MPH, University of California at San Francisco, 500 Parnassus Ave, Box 0900, MU-3E, Rm 306, San Francisco, CA 94143-0900.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.