You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 278 No. 5, August 6, 1997 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  Letters
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Citation map
 •Citing articles on HighWire
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

Efficacy of Midodrine for Neurogenic Orthostatic Hypotension

Ivan Berlin, MD, PhD
Pitié-Salpêtrière University Hospital Paris, France

JAMA. 1997;278(5):388.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

To the Editor.

—Orthostatic hypotension due to autonomic failure is an incapacitating condition for which treatment, despite various drug interventions (eg, yohimbine, metoclopramide, β-blockers, somatostatin analog) is not yet resolved. Therefore, the encouraging results of the study of Dr Low and colleagues1 are potentially of great importance. Although the pharmacological efficacy of midodrine, an {alpha}1-adrenoceptor agonist, is clearly demonstrated by this trial, the therapeutic effectiveness is not documented as well and is therefore less convincing. There are several important issues.

First, the number of patients included in the study should allow data analysis on an intention-to-treat basis. This approach would be preferable because of the particularly high dropout rate in the midodrine group (22 [27%] of 82 subjects) when compared with the placebo group (5 [5.6%] of 89 subjects). The difference in dropout rate during the 5 weeks of the study is significant (X2=14.44,P<.001). Would the . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1997 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.