This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Dixie E. Snider, MD, MPH

JAMA. 1997;278(8):624-626.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

THE STATEMENT "Protection of Patients' Rights to Privacy," which was agreed on by the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors (ICMJE) and published in the BMJin November 1995¹ is well intentioned but raises a number of issues and potential problems for clinical medicine and public health.

See also pp 628 and 682.

The statement, which is now included in the ICMJE Uniform Requirements,² is quoted verbatim and in toto as follows:

Patients have a right to privacy that should not be infringed without informed consent. Identifying information should not be published in written descriptions, photographs, and pedigrees unless the information is essential for scientific purposes and the patient (or parent or guardian) gives written informed consent for publication. Informed consent for this purpose requires that the patient be shown the manuscript to be published.

Identifying details should be omitted if they are not essential, but patient data . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
From the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, Atlanta, Ga.

Footnotes
Reprints: Dixie E Snider, MD, MPH, Mailstop D-50, Centers for Disease Control and Prevention, 1600 Clifton Rd NE, Atlanta, GA 30333.

Controversies section editor: Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, Senior Editor.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?