This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Linda Hawes Clever, MD

JAMA. 1997;278(8):628-629.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

AUTHORS OF SCIENTIFIC articles have an obligation to obtain informed consent of patients before the publication of data by which those patients can be identified. The purpose of this procedure is to maintain the efficacy and dignity of the individual. The challenge is to avoid the distribution of information that can lead to discrimination, recrimination, and shame; to job disqualification or the loss of work or insurance. The call is now because the spread of medical information can have consequences far into the future. One remedy is to require permission from patients before the publication of research and reports.

See also pp 624 and 682.

Standards are developed not just to affirm what is right but to avoid what is wrong. The Universal Declaration of Human Rights,¹ for example, asserts rights to work safely, to live healthily, and to speak freely. It also seeks to protect people from slavery . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Dr Clever is editor, Western Journal of Medicine, San Francisco, Calif.

Footnotes
Reprints: Linda Hawes Clever, MD, Western Journal of Medicine, 221 Main St, Third Floor, San Francisco, CA 94105.

Controversies section editor: Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, Senior Editor.

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?