This Article  • References  • Full text PDF  • Send to a friend  • Save in My Folder  • Save to citation manager  • Permissions  Citing Articles  • Citation map  • Citing articles on HighWire  • Contact me when this article is cited  Related Content  • Similar articles in JAMA  Social Bookmarking   What's this?

Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD; Richard M. Glass, MD

JAMA. 1997;278(8):682-683.

	Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

Two articles^1,2 in the Controversies section of this issue of THE JOURNAL explore the important issue of obtaining informed consent for publication when a scientific article contains identifying information about an individual.

See also pp 624 and 628.

Dr Snider,¹ associate director for science at the Centers for Disease Control and Prevention (CDC), argues that the requirement for consent as outlined in the statement, "Protection of Patients' Rights to Privacy," from the International Committee of Medical Journal Editors³ may create difficulties, especially for researchers charged with safeguarding the public health. Snider expresses concern regarding the interpretation and application of the ICMJE statement by medical journals, questions the logistics of the consent process and the appropriateness of removing data from articles, and suggests that there may be circumstances in which the requirement for informed consent for publication of articles with identifying information should be waived. From his public . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]

Author Affiliations
Dr Fontanarosa is Senior Editor, JAMA, and Dr Glass is Deputy Editor, JAMA.

Footnotes
Reprints: Phil B. Fontanarosa, MD, JAMA, 515 N State St, Chicago, IL60610 (e-mail: Phil Fontanarosa@ama-assn.org).

CiteULike    Connotea    Del.icio.us    Digg    Reddit    Technorati    Twitter     What's this?