You are seeing this message because your Web browser does not support basic Web standards. Find out more about why this message is appearing and what you can do to make your experience on this site better.


ABOUT JAMA
Advanced Search

Welcome   | My Account | E-mail Alerts | Access Rights | Sign In


  Vol. 93 No. 2, July 13, 1929 TABLE OF CONTENTS
  JAMA
  •  Online Features
  ARTICLES
 This Article
 •References
 •Full text PDF
 •Send to a friend
 • Save in My Folder
 •Save to citation manager
 •Permissions
 Citing Articles
 •Contact me when this article is cited
 Related Content
 •Similar articles in JAMA
 Social Bookmarking
  Add to CiteULike Add to Connotea Add to Del.icio.us Add to Digg Add to Reddit Add to Technorati Add to Twitter What's this?

LABORATORY-ENDORSED THERAPEUTIC AGENTS

MATHEMATICAL CALCULATION OF THEIR PROBABLE CLINICAL VALUE, ILLUSTRATED BY THE PROBABILITY COEFFICIENT FOR COMMERCIAL BACTERIOPHAGE

W. H. MANWARING, M.D.; A. P. KRUEGER, M.D.

J Am Med Assoc. 1929;93(2):95-96.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text PDF and any section headings.

The experimental laboratory stands as the first buffer between suggested curative agents and their clinical application. A hundred instinctive "hunches" may be tested in order that three or four may be endorsed for clinical trial. Any therapeutic agent thus endorsed, however, now faces a second buffer, a mathematical law of clinical probability. For many suggested agents the mathematical probability for or against clinical success is readily calculated.

CALCULATED PROBABILITY WITH VACCINES AND ANTISERUMS

Three decades of clinical experience with laboratory-endorsed vaccines and antiserums give ample data from which to calculate the probability coefficient for this class of therapeutic agents. Hundreds of theoretically logical, laboratory-endorsed vaccines and antiserums have been tried by clinicians; 95 per cent of them have been thrown into the clinical discard.

An impartial mathematician would conclude from this that our fundamental immunologic theories and current experimental laboratory methods assay less than 5 per cent clinically verifiable truth. . . . [Full Text PDF of this Article]


Author Affiliations

Professor of Bacteriology and Experimental Pathology, Stanford University School of Medicine; Instructor in Bacteriology, Stanford University School of Medicine; Associate (Elect) in General Physiology, Rockefeller Institute STANFORD UNIVERSITY, CALIF.



Add to CiteULike CiteULike   Add to Connotea Connotea   Add to Del.icio.us Del.icio.us   Add to Digg Digg   Add to Reddit Reddit   Add to Technorati Technorati   Add to Twitter Twitter     What's this?





HOME | CURRENT ISSUE | PAST ISSUES | TOPIC COLLECTIONS | CME | SUBMIT | SUBSCRIBE | HELP
CONDITIONS OF USE | PRIVACY POLICY | CONTACT US | SITE MAP
 
© 1929 American Medical Association. All Rights Reserved.