 |
Readers Responses to:
-
- Clinical Crossroads:
Ciarán P. Kelly
- A 76-Year-Old Man With Recurrent Clostridium difficile–Associated Diarrhea: Review of C difficile Infection
JAMA 2009; 301: 954-962
[Abstract]
[Full text]
[PDF]
|
|
Electronic letters published:
-
The burden of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections
- Els van Nood
(3 March 2009)
-
Très Difficile
- Nick Daneman
(3 March 2009)
-
Probiotics and C. Difficile
- Harvey F Carroll
(3 March 2009)
|
The burden of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections |
3 March 2009 |
|
|
Els van Nood, M.D. Academic Medical Center, department of Internal Medicine, Amsterdam, The Netherlands
Send response to journal:
Re: The burden of recurrent Clostridium difficile infections
e.vannood{at}amc.nl Els van Nood
|
Prolonged and persistent Clostridium difficile Infections (CDI) have
a tremendous impact on quality of life. As Mr S illustrates, the
chronicity, the uncertainty and the diarrhea lead to a deteriorating
state, with apparently no prospects for improvement or cure. In this case,
difficulties regarding the management of recurrent CDI already begin at
diagnosis. The sensitivity of various toxin tests, the most commonly used
diagnostic tool for the detection of CDI, range between 55 and 97%.(1-2)
Some clinicians therefore advocate repeated testing, which in turn may
lead to false positive outcomes. The cytotoxicity cell test is the gold
standard, and should be performed in difficult cases, even though it takes
2-3 days to complete the test.(2) Colonoscopy can be valuable in this
particular case, by showing either signs of CDI (pseudomembranous colitis
or typical volcano lesions in biopsies) or an alternative explanation
contributing to the recurrent diarrhea (microscopic colitis, inflammatory
bowel disease or malignancy).
In general, restricted use of antibiotics, in particular quinolones,
cephalosporins and clindamycin is considered a preventive measure.(3)
Glove wearing, hand washing and cleaning with chlorine-based detergents
all are effective infection control measures to prevent re-infection or
transmission to other patients.(4)
Initial CDI that requires antibiotic treatment is cured in 80% of
patients, with metronidazole and vancomycin being equally effective for
mild to moderate disease.(5) Oral vancomycin is the drug of choice in
severe and recurrent disease. For a first recurrence, a response rate of
67% is reported for antibiotic treatment.(6) However, the efficacy of
antibiotics for a second, third or next recurrence is not known, and may
be substantially lower.(7) Alternative antibiotic therapy may include
prolonged tapered and/or pulsed vancomycin schedules, although evidence
regarding efficacy is lacking. Additional therapies include
immunoglobulins, cholestyramine, rifaximin, or teicoplanin. Empirical
therapy, although tempting, should be avoided where possible; longstanding
vancomycin therapy, although not systemically absorbed, and therefore
considered as save, increases the risk for vancomycin resistant
enterococci, whereas prolonged courses of metronidazol can lead to
neurotoxic side effects.
Persistent disturbed intestinal flora is considered a prerequisite for
Clostridium difficile to grow and produce toxins, leading to diarrhea. It
is often not clear whether a recurrence or a new infection has taken
place, up to 56% of recurrences may in fact reflect reinfection.(8)
Cure of recurrent CDI by infusion of feces from (thoroughly screened)
healthy donors has been described in over 150 patients. The overall
reported success rate is about 90%, but a prospective randomised trial is
lacking. Feces mixed with saline can be infused either in the colon (ie, as
an enema) or by duodenal tube.(9) We have been treating patients with
donor feces for 2 years, with excellent results, and a randomised trial has
been initiated, comparing the efficacy of vancomycin with fecal
infusions.(10)
Awaiting the results of this study, donor feces infusion is tolerated
well, with promising results. If recurrent C.difficile can be demonstrated
in Mr S’ case, it could be very rewarding to offer this somewhat
“unaesthetic treatment approach”.(quote of John Bartlett)
Reference list
(1)Planche T, Aghaizu A, Holliman R, Riley P, Poloniecki J, Breathnach A,
et al. Diagnosis of Clostridium difficile infection by toxin detection
kits: a systematic review. Lancet Infect Dis 2008 Dec;8(12):777-84.
(2)Turgeon DK, Novicki TJ, Quick J, Carlson L, Miller P, Ulness B, et al.
Six rapid tests for direct detection of Clostridium difficile and its
toxins in fecal samples compared with the fibroblast cytotoxicity assay. J
Clin Microbiol 2003 Feb;41(2):667-70.
(3)Pepin J, Saheb N, Coulombe MA, Alary ME, Corriveau MP, Authier S, et
al. Emergence of fluoroquinolones as the predominant risk factor for
Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea: a cohort study during an
epidemic in Quebec. Clin Infect Dis 2005 Nov 1;41(9):1254-60.
(4)Fawley WN, Underwood S, Freeman J, Baines SD, Saxton K, Stephenson K,
et al. Efficacy of hospital cleaning agents and germicides against
epidemic Clostridium difficile strains. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 2007
Aug;28(8):920-5.
(5)Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of
vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-
associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis 2007
Aug 1;45(3):302-7.
(6)Pepin J, Routhier S, Gagnon S, Brazeau I. Management and outcomes of a
first recurrence of Clostridium difficile-associated disease in Quebec,
Canada. Clin Infect Dis 2006 Mar 15;42(6):758-64.
(7)McFarland LV, Elmer GW, Surawicz CM. Breaking the cycle: treatment
strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease. Am J
Gastroenterol 2002 Jul;97(7):1769-75.
(8)Wilcox MH, Fawley WN, Settle CD, Davidson A. Recurrence of symptoms in
Clostridium difficile infection--relapse or reinfection? J Hosp Infect
1998 Feb;38(2):93-100.
(9)Borody TJ, Warren EF, Leis SM, Surace R, Ashman O, Siarakas S.
Bacteriotherapy using fecal flora: toying with human motions. J Clin
Gastroenterol 2004 Jul;38(6):475-83.
(10)Nieuwdorp M, van NE, Speelman P, van Heukelem HA, Jansen JM, Visser
CE, et al. [Treatment of recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated
diarrhoea with a suspension of donor faeces]. Ned Tijdschr Geneeskd 2008
Aug 30;152(35):1927-32.
Financial disclosure: The FECAL trial is sponsored by a grant from
ZonMW, The Netherlands Organisation for Health Research and Development |
|
Très Difficile |
3 March 2009 |
|
|
Nick Daneman, MD, MSc, FRCPC Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre, University of Toronto
Send response to journal:
Re: Très Difficile
nick.daneman{at}sunnybrook.ca Nick Daneman
|
Mr S embodies the growing suffering generated by Clostridium
difficile colitis. Superimposed upon a doubling in incidence over the
last decade,(1) there have been dramatic increases in the acute severity of
C.difficile infections, characterized by more intensive care unit
admissions and colectomies and a four-fold rise in attributable
mortality.(2) One of the most common and difficult complications of
C.difficile colitis is disease recurrence. Traditionally, 1 in 4 patients
with C.difficile infection have experienced recurrent disease following
their initial treatment, and this risk appears to be increasing in recent
years, especially among elderly patients.(3, 4) Mr. S’s protracted course
of recurrences and altered quality of life are unfortunately typical of
the broader clinical experience with C.difficile.(4)
A substantial fraction of C.difficile recurrences result from
reinfection with the bacteria from its hospital reservoir (other colonized
and infected patients and their immediate environments).(5) However, many
recurrences relate to persistent infection with antibiotic-impermeable
C.difficile spores, which can then germinate (usually within 6 weeks of
initial infection) to produce the vegetative form of the organism.
Although a recent randomized controlled trial demonstrated vancomycin to
be superior to metronidazole in the treatment of acute severe C.difficile
infections,(6) it offers no advantage in preventing relapses.(4, 6)
Therefore, multiple treatment strategies have emerged to counter
relapsing C.difficile colitis; all supported by intriguing theoretic
rationales, none supported by rigorous evidence. Should we choose
combination therapy with rifaximin, to overcome potentially unmeasured
resistance to first line agents?(7) Should we taper or pulse vancomycin
therapy to allow time for spores to germinate to their virulent but
vulnerable form?(8) Adding or prolonging antibiotic therapy may worsen our
crisis of antibiotic resistance, so instead maybe we should replenish
patients’ microbial flora with nonpathogenic organisms (eg, Saccharomyces
boulardii) to outcompete C.difficile?(9) If Mr. S is truly “going out of
[his] mind”, and if he has a loving (or perhaps begrudging) family member,
his best bet to definitively restore his intestinal flora is via stool
transplantation.(10) Of course, he may find the idea of donor stool a lot
less palatable than a donor kidney. While we await clinical trials to
inform our treatment choices, it is clear that none of these strategies
offers a panacea for recurrent C.difficile colitis.
Therefore, as with other hospital-acquired infections, our greatest
emphasis must be on prevention. We must prevent acquisition of
C.difficile by implementing best infection control practices, such as
contact isolation for patients with diarrhea, strict hand hygiene
adherence, aggressive environmental cleaning, and outbreak surveillance.
More importantly we must minimize inappropriate antibiotic exposure among
all hospitalized patients, and in particular those with a recent diagnosis
of C.difficile colitis. One of the most important maneuvers in Mr. S’s
care, for example, was the removal of his foley cathether, to reduce his
risk of recurrent urinary tract infections and need for repeat antibiotic
treatments. Treatment of asymptomatic bacteriuria in this patient
population represents another common avoidable cause of C.difficile
recurrence. Mr. S has not accepted his C.difficile colitis as an expected
part of his healthcare experience. Nor should we.
No financial disclosures.
Reference List
1. McDonald LC, Owings M, Jernigan DB. Clostridium difficile
infection in patients discharged from US short-stay hospitals, 1996-2003.
Emerg Infect Dis 2006; 12(3):409-415.
2. Gravel D, Miller M, Simor A et al. Health care-associated Clostridium
difficile infection in adults admitted to acute care hospitals in Canada:
a Canadian Nosocomial Infection Surveillance Program Study. Clin Infect
Dis 2009; 48(5):568-576.
3. Pepin J, Alary ME, Valiquette L et al. Increasing risk of relapse after
treatment of Clostridium difficile colitis in Quebec, Canada. Clin Infect
Dis 2005; 40(11):1591-1597.
4. McFarland LV, Surawicz CM, Rubin M, Fekety R, Elmer GW, Greenberg RN.
Recurrent Clostridium difficile disease: epidemiology and clinical
characteristics. Infect Control Hosp Epidemiol 1999; 20(1):43-50.
5. Wilcox MH, Fawley WN, Settle CD, Davidson A. Recurrence of symptoms in
Clostridium difficile infection--relapse or reinfection? J Hosp Infect
1998; 38(2):93-100.
6. Zar FA, Bakkanagari SR, Moorthi KM, Davis MB. A comparison of
vancomycin and metronidazole for the treatment of Clostridium difficile-
associated diarrhea, stratified by disease severity. Clin Infect Dis 2007;
45(3):302-307.
7. Johnson S, Schriever C, Galang M, Kelly CP, Gerding DN. Interruption of
recurrent Clostridium difficile-associated diarrhea episodes by serial
therapy with vancomycin and rifaximin. Clin Infect Dis 2007; 44(6):846-
848.
8. McFarland LV, Elmer GW, Surawicz CM. Breaking the cycle: treatment
strategies for 163 cases of recurrent Clostridium difficile disease. Am J
Gastroenterol 2002; 97(7):1769-1775.
9. McFarland LV. Meta-analysis of probiotics for the prevention of
antibiotic associated diarrhea and the treatment of Clostridium difficile
disease. Am J Gastroenterol 2006; 101(4):812-822.
10. Aas J, Gessert CE, Bakken JS. Recurrent Clostridium difficile colitis:
case series involving 18 patients treated with donor stool administered
via a nasogastric tube. Clin Infect Dis 2003; 36(5):580-585. |
|
Probiotics and C. Difficile |
3 March 2009 |
|
|
Harvey F Carroll, PhD retired from City University of NY
Send response to journal:
Re: Probiotics and C. Difficile
hcarroll123{at}comcast.net Harvey F Carroll
|
I would consider probiotics such as Saccharomyces
boulardii along with antibiotic therapy. Long term use of the probiotics
might prevent the recurrence of the C. difficile after the antibiotics
have eradicated it.
References:
Surawicz CM, McFarland LV, Greenberg RN,
et al. The search for a better treatment for
recurrent Clostridium difficile disease: use of
high-dose vancomycin combined with Saccharomyces
boulardii. Clin Infect Dis
2000;31:1012-1017.
Pochapin M. The effect of probiotics on
Clostridium difficile diarrhea. Am J
Gastroenterol 2000;95:S11-S13.
Marteau PR, de Vrese M, Cellier CJ,
Schrezenmeir J. Protection from gastrointestinal
diseases with the use of probiotics. Am J
Clin Nutr 2001;73:430S-436S.
Jeanne A. Drisko, Cheryl K. Giles, Bette J. Bischoff. Probiotics in
Health Maintenance
and Disease Prevention. Altern Med Rev 2003;8(2):143-155) |
|
 |