Advertisement
Editorial
JAMA. 1981;245(22):2333. doi: 10.1001/jama.1981.03310470047027

Vasectomy—A Note of Concern: Reprise

  1. Hugh H. Hussey, MD
  1. Dallas
  2. From the University of Texas Health Science Center at Dallas.

Since this article does not have an abstract, we have provided the first 150 words of the full text.

Excerpt

The title of my comments derives from Harold Lear's editorial, published in The Journal almost a decade ago.1 Since Lear wrote, additional signs of concern have appeared, including the article in this issue by Walker and his colleagues (p 2315).

In a carefully controlled study, Walker et al report causes for hospitalization of vasectomized men, compared with hospitalization for the same ailments in men who had not undergone vasectomy.

Disorders of the genitourinary system constituted the only category in which hospitalization incidences were significantly greater in the vasectomized men than in the control population. However, the disorders included epididymitis and orchitis (well known though infrequent postvasectomy complications) and benign prostatic hypertrophy, redundant prepuce, phimosis, and other diseases of the male genitals. The authors wisely observe that the latter four conditions probably had been discovered when clients applied for vasectomy and that these conditions were not attributable to the operation

Footnotes

  • Address editorial communications to the Editor, 535 N Dearborn St, Chicago, IL 60610.

« Previous | Next Article »Table of Contents

More in JAMA & Archives Journals